By Liz Merton

October 6, 2020

So last week (September 27 to October 3) was this year’s banned-books week. Dating to 1982, Banned Books Week considers the issue of challenges to books (for example, in libraries and at schools). You can learn more at the Banned Books Week website. Given the significance of publishing, of access to information, of freedom of expression, I couldn’t help but give these issues some thought and jot out a quick note for Read Local®.


First, no matter what side you fall on when it comes to the issue of access to books on controversial topics, I think getting back to fundamentals helps shape the discussion. In the U.S.A., at least for now, the First Amendment does a pretty darn good job of ensuring that publishers can publish whatever they want. A private individual or company can publish almost any kind of book they want to publish. Exceptions exist. You can’t publish a collection of child pornography. But these narrow exceptions fall beyond the scope of this short piece. Essentially, no censor is going to jump out of the bushes and force you to change language in a book or remove a “disturbing” topic. You won’t face civil or criminal penalties for publishing an unpopular story.


Rather, the issue of “banned books” in the U.S. revolves around complaints about books bought by libraries (using tax dollars) or made accessible in public schools (tax dollars), or marked as required reading in public schools. Again, exceptions exist, but generally, American book challenges boil down to tax money paying for the book, or the government (through public schools) requiring kids to read the book.


The government hasn’t said that someone cannot read these “banned books.” It hasn’t interfered with the publication of these books. We’ve got a Bill of Rights to address those concerns. Where the problem arises is “concerned citizens” questioning the use of their tax dollars or the education of their kids. Maybe these people do not want their local library’s budget going to pay for X book. Maybe they don’t want their fifth grader to have to read X book for school.


This aspect of the problem makes it far more complicated. If the government banned publication of a book, the issue would (for most people reared in a liberal democracy) be a pretty simple one, I’m thinking. But the issue just isn’t that simple. Take And Tango Makes Three, number ten on the 2019 Banned Books Week list of challenged books. This picture book for preschoolers and kindergartners focuses on two male penguins who want to form a nontraditional family. Like many in the online writing community have opined, I don’t think my head will explode if I read this book. (Nor do I think a little kid’s head would explode.) But what if a high-school teacher (at a public school) wanted to make Charles Rice’s 50 Questions on the Natural Law required reading? The book presents an “accessible discussion” of Catholic teachings on natural law and social issues.


Everybody has their opinions about how we should order society. In a diverse, liberal democracy—with only a few agreed-upon governing or foundational principals—it gets pretty hard to say what’s in and what’s out. (We can save a debate on relativism and positivism for another day.) While a banned-books list sheds some light on the issues that are controversial for the country (and which issues garner the attention of “activist taxpayers”), I just don’t think it says as much about “banning books” as some people suggest because I’m guessing, in certain circumstances, most of us (if we were being completely honest) would have an issue with our kids being forced to read certain books or with our tax money going to pay for certain books. Maybe not. . . . Maybe there are taxpayers and parents out there who would truly be open to anything.


Maybe we are just a revolutionary people. Likely most of us feel pretty committed to “raging against the man” in the right circumstances. It’s just that no one agrees on who “the man” is, what the “right circumstances” are, and how best to “rage.” Anyway, I have found some value in pondering “banned books” over the last week.

Banned Books:

Considering the Concept in America

Read Local, L.L.C., is a small (we hope to grow!) community of book lovers. We review books published by independent/university/small presses and post our reviews and thoughts in an effort to raise awareness of independent-press books. The Read Local, L.L.C., entity is owned by the parent company of Stoneman House Press, L.L.C., and that publisher's work appears on this website (we make money when Stoneman House sells books), but not everyone who writes content for us or participates in our community works for Stoneman House. Aside from Stoneman House, we also have relationships (personal and/or professional) with some of the authors whose books appear here. Some (like Sage Webb) write reviews for us and help lead us (and they make money when their books sell). We note when we have a relationship with a book, publisher, or author. Otherwise, we do not have relationships with the authors and publishers listed here. They appear here only because we liked their books and we like reviewing books. (We will be as transparent as possible when we post here about things in which we have a financial stake. Not just because of regulations like those in Part 255 of Title 16 of the Code of Federal Regulations, but because we really are here just to have some literary fun.) If you are an author or publisher of a book that appears here, feel free to reach out to us! We'd love to hear from you. We are at And if you are an author or publisher and you would like us to remove your book from our site, just let us know. We are here to serve the literary community. If you have questions, reach out.

(We also love innovative art and photography. Just sayin'.)

© 2018, 2019 , 2020 Read Local, L.L.C.

(All content on this site belongs exclusively to Read Local, L.L.C. No one may copy any portion of this site or its content without express written permission.)

Read Local is a registered service mark with the USPTO.

Read Local, L.L.C., reserves all rights in and to its marks.